CALL US NOW: (305) 224-6811
Lorenzo Law
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Probate Attorney
    • Probate Litigation Lawyer
    • Estate Planning Attorney
    • Trust Litigation Attorney
    • Guardianship Attorney
    • Guardianship Litigation Attorney
    • Wrongful Death Claims
    • Partition Actions
  • Service Areas
  • The Firm
  • About
  • Florida Probate & Estate Blog
    • Probate
    • Deeds & Property
    • Estate Planning
    • Trusts
    • Estate Disputes
    • Guardianship
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • FREE CONSULTATION
  • ☎ (305) 224-6811
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Man in suit beside Lorenzo Law logo.

Florida trust litigation attorney

A Florida trust litigation attorney is who you need when a trust is being fought over rather than simply administered — a trustee who will not account, a trust amendment signed weeks before a death, money moving out of the trust and into someone else’s name. Jose M. Lorenzo, Jr. handles contested trust matters in all 67 Florida counties, in English and in Spanish. The initial consultation is free.

Updated August 23, 2026. Every statute on this page was read against the current Florida Trust Code this week. The deadline that quietly ends most trust cases is §736.1008 — six months from the day an accounting reaches you.

What is trust litigation?

Trust litigation is a lawsuit about a trust. In Florida it takes one of two forms, and they are governed by different statutes, proved with different evidence, and run on different clocks.

  • A trust contest. You are challenging how the trust or an amendment was made — undue influence, fraud, duress, mistake, or a settlor who lacked capacity. This runs under §736.0406.
  • A breach of trust claim. You are disputing what the trustee has done since — self-dealing, a missing accounting, money that left the trust. This runs under §736.1001 and §736.0802.

People search for this in a dozen different ways — how to contest a trust, how to challenge a trust, disputing a trust, suing a trustee, a trust lawsuit. They are the same two fights underneath. The rest of this page answers both, statute by statute.

Can a trustee sell trust property without all the beneficiaries approving?

Often yes — but not if the trustee is on both sides of the sale.

A trustee generally holds the power to sell trust property without a vote of the beneficiaries. What the trustee cannot do is sell it in a way that serves the trustee. §736.0802(1) states the rule plainly: a trustee shall administer the trust solely in the interests of the beneficiaries.

Subsection (2) is the one that decides cases. A sale or transaction entered into by the trustee “for the trustee’s own personal account or which is otherwise affected by a conflict between the trustee’s fiduciary and personal interests is voidable by a beneficiary.”

Voidable by a beneficiary — meaning you can undo it. Not merely complain about it.

And subsection (3) does the hardest work for you. The statute presumes a conflict when the trustee transacts with:

  • the trustee’s spouse
  • the trustee’s descendants, siblings or parents, or their spouses
  • certain affiliated persons and entities

So a trustee who sells the family house to their own brother has not merely made a questionable decision. The conflict is presumed, and the transaction is voidable unless the trustee can bring it inside one of the statutory exceptions — the trust authorized it, the court approved it, you consented or ratified it, or you waited too long to sue. That last exception is why the six-month clock below matters so much.

Can a trustee go to jail for stealing from a trust?

It is possible, but the criminal case is not your case. Charging is a State Attorney’s decision, and it turns on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Your recovery runs through the civil side, and the civil side is far more powerful than most beneficiaries realize.

Three tracks, and they stack:

  1. Breach of trust. §736.1001 lets the court trace and claw back — see the remedies table below.
  2. Civil theft, potentially trebled. Where the conduct amounts to exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult, §772.11 gives a person injured by a violation of §825.103(1), proved “by clear and convincing evidence,” a claim for threefold the actual damages — subject to a written pre-suit demand and a 30-day compliance window.
  3. Criminal exposure. §825.103 makes exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult a felony graded by value: third degree under $10,000, second degree from $10,000 to under $50,000, first degree at $50,000 or more.

The practical order is civil first. Build the civil case, let the criminal referral follow if the facts warrant it. A jail sentence returns nothing to the trust. If a trustee stole money from the trust, the question that matters to you is where the money went — not whether anyone is prosecuted.

How do you contest a trust in Florida?

Two entirely different attacks, and confusing them costs cases.

Contesting how the trust was made. §736.0406: “If the creation, amendment, or restatement of a trust is procured by fraud, duress, mistake, or undue influence, the trust or any part so procured is void.”

Three features matter:

  • Amendments and restatements are covered, not just the original trust. The single most common Florida trust contest is not an attack on a twenty-year-old trust — it is a challenge to the suspicious trust amendment signed eleven weeks before the death that moved everything to one child.
  • Only the part so procured is void. The rest survives. You do not have to take down the whole instrument.
  • A procured revocation is also void. If someone pressured the settlor into revoking a trust, that act is attackable on its own.

Capacity is a separate ground. §736.0402(1)(a) makes settlor capacity an element of creating a trust at all. A trust or amendment signed by someone who lacked capacity was never validly created — a different argument from undue influence, and often pleaded alongside it.

Disputing what the trustee has done since. That is breach of trust, and it runs under §736.1001 and §736.0802 rather than §736.0406. Different proof, different remedies, different clock.

⚠️ Timing. §736.0207 provides that an action to contest the validity of a revocable trust may not be commenced until the trust becomes irrevocable by its terms or by the settlor’s death. You cannot pre-empt the fight while the settlor is alive — which is exactly why the evidence has to be preserved before then.

How long do you have to contest a trust in Florida?

Shorter than almost anyone expects, and the trustee controls when the clock starts.

§736.0604 bars an action to contest the validity of a trust that was revocable at the settlor’s death unless it is commenced within the earlier of:

  1. the time provided in chapter 95; or
  2. “Six months after the trustee sent the person a copy of the trust instrument and a notice informing the person of the trust’s existence, of the trustee’s name and address, and of the time allowed for commencing a proceeding.”

Three things follow from the way that is written, and each one costs people cases:

  • The trustee is not required to send it. Sending it is optional. What sending it does is shorten your window to six months. A trustee who wants the contest window closed sends the packet early — and a beneficiary who files it away has six months from the day it went out.
  • It runs from sending, not receipt. Compare §736.1008 below, which runs from receipt. Two clocks, two different triggers, on the same page of the same statute book.
  • The bar runs to the earlier date. Chapter 95 is the outer limit, never an extension.

If a packet containing a trust instrument and a notice has arrived, the date on it is the most important fact in your case. Bring the envelope.

Is a no-contest clause enforceable in a Florida trust?

No. Florida is one of the states that will not enforce a penalty clause for contest.

§736.1108(1): “A provision in a trust instrument purporting to penalize any interested person for contesting the trust instrument or instituting other proceedings relating to a trust estate or trust assets is unenforceable.”

One limitation worth knowing. Subsection (2) applies the rule to trusts created on or after October 1, 1993 — and “a revocable trust shall be treated as created when the right of revocation terminates,” which for most people means the settlor’s death. In practice that puts nearly every modern Florida revocable trust inside the rule.

So the in terrorem clause your sibling is waving at you — the one that says you forfeit your share if you contest the trust — is very probably unenforceable. In Florida you can challenge a trust without losing your share to the clause that threatens it. It is still worth reading before you file, because the clause’s existence tells you something about who drafted the trust and why.

How much does a trustee get paid?

More than beneficiaries expect, and it is challengeable.

Where the trust says nothing, §736.0708 entitles a trustee to “compensation that is reasonable under the circumstances.” There is no fixed percentage in the statute.

Where the trust does specify an amount, the court may still adjust it if:

  • “the duties of the trustee are substantially different from those contemplated when the trust was created,” or
  • “the compensation specified by the terms of the trust would be unreasonably low or high.”

That second ground is the one that gets used. A trustee taking a percentage fee on a trust holding a single house, and doing almost nothing, is taking compensation a court can reduce. And under §736.1001 the court can reduce or deny compensation entirely as a remedy for breach — which is often the fastest money back into a trust.

Can a trustee also be a beneficiary?

Yes, and it is extremely common — the eldest child is named both trustee and beneficiary. Florida does not prohibit it. What it does is put that person in permanent tension with §736.0802(1), the duty to administer “solely in the interests of the beneficiaries” — all of them, not just the one in the chair.

Where that combination produces litigation:

  • Distributions. The trustee-beneficiary takes distributions and finds reasons the others must wait.
  • Occupancy. The trustee-beneficiary lives in the trust’s house rent-free while the other beneficiaries wait for a sale.
  • Purchases. The trustee-beneficiary buys trust property — self-dealing under §736.0802(2), voidable.
  • Fees. The trustee-beneficiary pays themselves a trustee fee and takes their share.

None of these is automatically improper. All of them are worth an accounting.

What is a successor trustee?

The person or institution who takes over when the original trustee dies, resigns, or is removed. In most Florida revocable trusts, the settlor is their own trustee while alive, and the successor trustee steps in at death — which is the moment nearly every trust dispute actually begins.

Three things a successor trustee owes you from the moment they accept, under §736.0813:

  • Within 60 days of accepting, notice of the acceptance and their name and address.
  • Within 60 days of the trust becoming irrevocable, notice of its existence, the settlor’s identity, and your right to request a copy of the trust instrument.
  • A trust accounting at least annually, on termination, and on a change of trustee.

A successor trustee who has not told you the trust exists is already in breach of the statute’s opening sentence: “The trustee shall keep the qualified beneficiaries of the trust reasonably informed of the trust and its administration.”

What happens when cotrustees disagree?

§736.0703(1) is short: “Cotrustees who are unable to reach a unanimous decision may act by majority decision.” If a vacancy occurs, the remaining cotrustees — or a majority of them — may act for the trust.

What the statute does not do is break a tie. Two cotrustees who split evenly have no majority, and §736.0703 supplies no answer. A genuine co-trustee deadlock is resolved in court, either by a proceeding for instructions under §736.0201 or by removing one of them — and note that “lack of cooperation among cotrustees that substantially impairs the administration of the trust” is its own removal ground under §736.0706.

Two more subsections matter if you are the cotrustee being outvoted. A cotrustee who does not join in an action is not liable for it, and a dissenting cotrustee who goes along with a majority decision but notifies the others of the dissent is protected. But every cotrustee must “use reasonable care to prevent a cotrustee from committing a serious breach of trust” and to compel redress if one occurs. Staying quiet is not a defense.

Want to know how long your case will take?A short call gives you a realistic timeline — at no cost.

Call (305) 224-6811

Can a trustee change a trust?

Generally no. A trustee administers the trust; they do not rewrite it. The power to amend belongs to the settlor, and only while the trust is revocable.

Where beneficiaries get confused — and where real disputes hide:

  • A trust amendment signed near the end of the settlor’s life is not the trustee changing the trust. It is the settlor doing so, and it is attackable under §736.0406 if procured by undue influence.
  • Decanting, judicial modification, or termination by agreement or court order are real mechanisms — but they are not the trustee acting alone on their own authority. See the next section.
  • A trustee exercising discretion — deciding whether to distribute — is not changing the trust, though it can be a breach if exercised in bad faith or for the trustee’s own benefit.

If a trustee tells you the trust “was changed” and cannot produce the signed instrument that changed it, that is the whole case.

Can a trust be fixed instead of fought over?

Sometimes, and it is worth asking before anyone files. Florida gives four routes that are cheaper than litigation and are not trust contests at all.

  • Trust reformation. §736.0415 lets a court reform the terms of a trust “even if unambiguous” to conform them to the settlor’s intent — but only on clear and convincing evidence that a mistake of fact or law affected both the settlor’s intent and the terms. The court may consider evidence that contradicts the plain meaning of the document.
  • Judicial modification. Trust modification by court order. §736.04113 permits a trustee or a qualified beneficiary — not any interested person — to ask a court to modify or terminate an irrevocable trust where its purposes have become “illegal, impossible, wasteful, or impracticable to fulfill,” where unanticipated circumstances would defeat a material purpose, or where a material purpose no longer exists.
  • Decanting. §736.04117 lets an “authorized trustee” — one who is neither the settlor nor a beneficiary — pour the assets of one trust into a second trust with better terms. It requires written notice to all qualified beneficiaries at least 60 days before it takes effect, with copies of both trust instruments. If you have received a decanting notice, sixty days is your window to object.
  • Nonjudicial settlement agreement. §736.0111 lets interested persons resolve almost any trust matter by written agreement — construction of the terms, approval of an accounting, a trustee’s resignation or compensation, even a trustee’s liability. The limit is real: an NJSA “is valid only to the extent the terms and conditions could be properly approved by the court,” and cannot be used to reach a result the Trust Code does not allow.

None of these is available to a beneficiary who simply dislikes the outcome. All of them are worth checking before a trust lawsuit is filed.

Is a trustee the same as an executor?

No. Different appointment, different oversight, different court involvement — and in Florida the words are different too.

  Personal representative (what most people call the executor) Trustee
Governed by Florida Probate Code, Chapters 731–735 Florida Trust Code, Chapter 736
Appointed by The court, in an open probate case The trust document, usually with no court involvement
Supervised by The probate court throughout Nobody, unless a beneficiary goes to court
Handles Assets that pass under the will Assets titled in the trust
Accounting Filed with the court Sent to beneficiaries, not filed

That third row is the one that matters. A trustee operates with no automatic oversight at all. No judge reviews their accounting unless a beneficiary brings it to one. That is why trust abuse frequently runs for years before anyone notices, and why the duty-to-inform rules in §736.0813 do so much work.

The same person is often both — trustee of the trust and personal representative of the estate. That is legal, and it doubles the places a conflict can arise.

Does a trustee own the trust property?

Legally yes, beneficially no, and the distinction is the entire foundation of trust law.

The trustee holds legal title — their name is on the deed, on the account. The beneficiaries hold equitable title — the benefit. The trustee is holding it for you.

Which is why “it’s in my name” is not a defense to anything. A trustee whose name is on the account and who spends from it has not exercised ownership; they have committed a breach of trust, and every remedy in §736.1001 is available.

Is breach of fiduciary duty a crime?

Usually not by itself. Breach of trust is a civil wrong. It becomes criminal when the conduct also amounts to theft or elder exploitation — see §825.103 above. But civil does not mean toothless, and this is the section beneficiaries most need to see.

Under §736.1001(2), to remedy a breach of trust that has occurred or may occur, the court may:

# Remedy
1 Compel the trustee to perform the trustee’s duties
2 Enjoin the trustee from committing a breach of trust
3 Compel redress — by paying money or restoring property
4 Order the trustee to account
5 Appoint a special fiduciary to take possession of the trust property and administer the trust
6 Suspend the trustee
7 Remove the trustee under §736.0706
8 Reduce or deny compensation to the trustee
9 Void an act, impose a lien or constructive trust, or trace trust property wrongfully disposed of
10 Order any other appropriate relief

Read remedies 5, 6 and 9 together. A court can take the trust away from the trustee, hand it to a neutral, and trace the money into whatever it was turned into — a car, a condo, another account. “It’s already spent” is not the end of the conversation.

What is a surcharge action against a trustee?

Surcharge is the word Florida practitioners use for making a trustee pay the trust back personally. It is remedy 3 in the table above, and §736.1002 supplies the measure.

A trustee who commits a breach of trust “is liable for the greater of”:

  • “The amount required to restore the value of the trust property and trust distributions to what they would have been if the breach had not occurred, including lost income, capital gain, or appreciation that would have resulted from proper administration”; or
  • “The profit the trustee made by reason of the breach.”

Two points that change how a case is valued. First, the measure is not simply what left the trust — it is what the trust would have been worth, including the appreciation a properly managed asset would have produced. A house sold below market in 2019 is measured against what it would be worth now. Second, where several people are liable, §736.1002 provides for pro rata contribution among them — but there is no contribution for anyone “who committed the breach of trust in bad faith.”

What do you do if the trustee has already spent the money?

You trace it. This is the single most common thing beneficiaries assume is hopeless and is not.

Remedy 9 in §736.1001(2) lets a court “impose a lien or a constructive trust on trust property, [or] trace trust property wrongfully disposed of and recover the property or its proceeds.” Money that left the trust and became a boat is still recoverable as the boat. Money that went into a third party’s account can be followed there, subject to the protections that innocent purchasers get.

Combined with §736.1002’s damages measure and remedy 8 — reducing or denying the trustee’s compensation — the practical answer is that “there is nothing left” is a claim to test, not a fact to accept. What determines whether tracing works is records, and records is why the accounting fight below usually comes first.

What are your rights as a beneficiary of a Florida trust?

More than most beneficiaries are ever told.

§736.0813 opens with a duty, not a discretion: “The trustee shall keep the qualified beneficiaries of the trust reasonably informed of the trust and its administration.”

The term qualified beneficiary is defined in §736.0103 and is narrower than “beneficiary.” It means a living beneficiary who, on the date qualification is determined, is a distributee or permissible distributee of income or principal — or would be one if the current interests terminated, or if the trust terminated by its terms that day. If you are a remainder beneficiary who takes only after your parent dies, read that definition closely; you may well be inside it.

Concretely, you are entitled to:

  • Notice within 60 days of the trustee accepting the trust — name and address.
  • Notice within 60 days of the trust becoming irrevocable — its existence, the settlor’s identity, and your right to request a copy of the trust instrument.
  • A copy of the trust instrument, on request.
  • A trust accounting at least annually, on termination, and whenever the trustee changes.
  • Relevant information about the assets and liabilities and the particulars of administration.

A trustee who answers “you’re not entitled to see that” is, in most cases, simply wrong.

One substitution to watch for. A trustee who hands you a certification of trust under §736.1017 has given you a summary designed for banks and title companies — not the trust instrument. It is a legitimate document for third parties. It does not satisfy a qualified beneficiary’s right to a copy of the trust itself.

What if the trustee refuses to give you an accounting?

You file. This is the most common first move in Florida trust litigation and the cheapest one.

The trust accounting is not a courtesy. §736.0813 requires it annually, on termination, and on a change of trustee. When a trustee will not produce one — or produces something that is not an accounting at all — remedy 4 in §736.1001(2) lets the court “order the trustee to account,” and remedy 1 lets the court compel performance of the trustee’s duties generally.

What a petition to compel a trust accounting does, beyond producing the document:

  • It creates a record. A trustee who refuses a court-ordered accounting is demonstrating the third removal ground in §736.0706 — persistent failure to administer effectively.
  • It starts the tracing. You cannot follow money you cannot see.
  • It is narrow. A beneficiary asking for what the statute already requires is not launching a trust contest, and the trustee cannot characterize it as one.

The same is true of a trustee who is not communicating with beneficiaries at all — no accounting, no answers, no distributions. A written demand for an accounting, sent and dated, is the document that turns silence into a removal ground.

How do you remove a trustee in Florida?

§736.0706 — the settlor, a cotrustee or a beneficiary may ask the court to remove a trustee, and the court may also act on its own initiative.

Four grounds:

  1. A serious breach of trust.
  2. Lack of cooperation among cotrustees that substantially impairs the administration.
  3. Unfitness, unwillingness, or persistent failure to administer effectively, where removal best serves the beneficiaries’ interests.
  4. A substantial change of circumstances, or removal requested by all qualified beneficiaries — where removal serves all beneficiaries, is not inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust, and a suitable successor is available.

Note the third ground. “Persistent failure to administer effectively” does not require dishonesty. A trustee who is simply not doing the job — no accountings, no distributions, no answers — is removable on that basis alone.

And note the fourth. Where all qualified beneficiaries agree and a suitable successor exists, trustee removal does not require proving misconduct at all.

How long do you have to sue a trustee?

This is the clock that quietly kills Florida trust claims.

§736.1008 bars a beneficiary from suing for breach of trust over any matter “adequately disclosed in a trust disclosure document” unless the proceeding is commenced within six months after receipt.

Read that again with the emphasis where it belongs: receipt, not discovery. Not when you understood it. Not when you had it reviewed. Six months from the day it landed.

An accounting that discloses a questionable transaction, sent with a proper limitation notice, starts a six-month fuse on that transaction. Filing it in a drawer does not stop the clock. Beneficiaries routinely lose good claims this way — not because the claim was weak, but because the paperwork was received and never read.

Read every accounting the week it arrives, and if anything in it is unclear, ask that week.

Two clocks, not one. §736.1008 governs breach-of-trust claims and runs from your receipt of a disclosure document. §736.0604 above governs trust contests and runs from the trustee’s sending of the instrument and notice. A case can be inside one and outside the other.

Neither is the ordinary statute of limitations. Both are shortening provisions that run inside the chapter 95 period, and both can close while a general statute of limitations is still open. That is the trap: a claim that looks timely on a four-year calendar can already be barred.

Can you sue a trustee personally?

For breach of trust, yes — that is what a surcharge action is, and §736.1002 measures it against the trustee, not the trust.

The section people misread is §736.1013, “Limitation on personal liability of trustee.” It protects a trustee from third parties — a contractor, a tort claimant — where the trustee properly disclosed the fiduciary capacity, and it makes a trustee personally liable for torts or for obligations arising from control of trust property “only if the trustee is personally at fault.”

It is not a shield against beneficiaries. A trustee who cites §736.1013 in response to a beneficiary’s surcharge claim is citing the wrong statute. Subsection (4) says so directly: issues of liability between the trust estate and the trustee individually may be determined “in a proceeding for accounting, surcharge, or indemnification.”

Can you be the trustee of your own irrevocable trust?

Frequently the answer is that you can, and frequently it is a bad idea — and in Florida trust litigation it shows up as the reason a trust failed to do what it was set up for.

Where a settlor keeps too much control over an irrevocable trust, the protective purposes it was created for — creditor protection, tax treatment, Medicaid planning — can be undermined. Whether that has happened is a document-and-conduct question, not a label question.

For litigation purposes, the relevant point is narrower: a settlor-trustee is still a trustee, and every duty in Chapter 736 applies to them — loyalty under §736.0802, the duty to inform and account under §736.0813, and exposure to every remedy in §736.1001.

For the planning-stage version of this question — and what § 736.0505(1)(b) means before a dispute starts — see choosing a trustee in Florida.

What is a spendthrift trust, and can creditors reach it?

A spendthrift trust is one whose terms stop a beneficiary from giving away or borrowing against their interest, and stop creditors from seizing it before it is paid out.

§736.0502(1) sets a strict test: “A spendthrift provision is valid only if the provision restrains both voluntary and involuntary transfer of a beneficiary’s interest.” A clause that restrains only one is not a valid spendthrift provision. Subsection (2) supplies the shortcut — saying the interest is “held subject to a spendthrift trust, or words of similar import” is enough to restrain both.

Where a spendthrift clause is valid, subsection (3) means a creditor “may not reach the interest or a distribution by the trustee before receipt of the interest or distribution by the beneficiary.” Once the money is in the beneficiary’s hands, it is fair game.

The exceptions. §736.0503(2) makes a spendthrift clause unenforceable against a beneficiary’s child, spouse or former spouse holding a support or maintenance judgment; a judgment creditor who provided services protecting the beneficiary’s interest in the trust; and claims of the state or the United States where a statute so provides.

Those exceptions are narrower than they sound. The claimant needs an actual judgment or court order, the remedy is an order attaching present or future distributions rather than the trust corpus, and for the first two categories it is available “only as a last resort upon an initial showing that traditional methods of enforcing the claim are insufficient.”

Spendthrift clauses also surface in modification fights. Under §736.04113(3) a court “shall consider spendthrift provisions as a factor” but “is not precluded from modifying a trust because the trust contains spendthrift provisions.”

What is a corporate trustee, and can you remove one?

A bank or trust company serving as trustee. They bring recordkeeping and neutrality, and they bring fee schedules and slow decisions.

They are removable on exactly the same grounds as an individual — §736.0706 does not distinguish. In practice the two arguments that work against a corporate trustee are the fourth ground (substantial change of circumstances, all qualified beneficiaries agreeing, suitable successor available) and, on compensation, §736.0708’s “unreasonably high” standard.

How do you choose a trustee?

The question this office sees most often is the reverse — how do you undo a bad choice — but the litigation record points at the same three answers every time:

  • Do not name a beneficiary who is in conflict with the others unless the trust says clearly how that conflict resolves.
  • Name a successor, and a successor to the successor. A vacancy is its own expensive proceeding.
  • Say what the compensation is. §736.0708 defaults to “reasonable,” and “reasonable” is what gets litigated.

Planning side: if you are choosing a trustee rather than trying to remove one, see our full guide to how to choose a trustee in Florida.

Who pays for trust litigation in Florida?

Sometimes the trust. Sometimes the losing party. Sometimes you, out of your own share.

§736.1004 is the fee statute, and it reaches two categories: actions for breach of fiduciary duty or challenging a trustee’s exercise of (or failure to exercise) their powers, and proceedings arising under §§736.0410–736.0417. In those, the court “shall award taxable costs as in chancery actions, including attorney fees and guardian ad litem fees.”

Two qualifications matter more than the word “shall.”

  • “As in chancery actions” imports equitable discretion. Florida courts do not read this as a guaranteed fee award in every case. Anyone who tells you a fee recovery is automatic is overselling it.
  • Where the money comes from is discretionary too. Subsection (2) lets the court “direct payment from a party’s interest, if any, in the trust or enter a judgment that may be satisfied from other property of the party, or both.” A beneficiary who litigates badly can end up paying out of their own share.

The fee hook is also narrower than the whole field — it is not a general trust-litigation fee statute, and a trust contest under §736.0406 is not on the list.

Contingency. Some Florida trust cases can be handled on a contingency fee, some on an hourly basis, and some on a blend. It depends on whether there is an identifiable asset to recover and how much of the work is document reconstruction. That conversation happens on the first call, before you are asked to sign anything.

What does trust litigation cost, and how long does it take?

It depends on whether the fight is about the document (§736.0406 — how the trust or amendment was made) or the conduct (§736.1001 and §736.0802 — what the trustee has done). Conduct cases turn on records; document cases turn on witnesses and medical history.

What drives the number:

  • how many years of accountings must be reconstructed, and whether the trustee kept any
  • whether trust assets include Florida real property, a closely held business, or out-of-state accounts
  • whether the trustee is also a beneficiary — which merges two disputes into one
  • whether a guardianship or power of attorney ran alongside the trust
  • whether the six-month bar in §736.1008 is in play for some transactions and not others

What you will not read here is an estimate of your odds. Rule 4-7.13 prohibits promises about outcomes, and no honest lawyer prices a case they have not seen.

How do most Florida trust disputes actually end?

In writing, before trial. That is not a softener — it is what the Trust Code is built to encourage.

§736.0111 lets interested persons enter a binding nonjudicial settlement agreement “with respect to any matter involving a trust,” and the listed subjects cover most of what people actually fight about: construction of the trust’s terms, approval of a trustee’s report or accounting, a trustee’s resignation or appointment, a trustee’s compensation, transfer of the principal place of administration, and the liability of a trustee for an action relating to the trust.

The limit is the one worth quoting: an NJSA “is valid only to the extent the terms and conditions could be properly approved by the court,” and may not be used “to produce a result not authorized by other provisions of this code.” Any interested person may ask the court to approve or disapprove one.

Court-ordered mediation resolves a further share. Cases that go the distance are usually the ones where a trustee will not produce records, which is why the accounting fight above is where leverage is built.

Where is a Florida trust lawsuit filed?

In circuit court, and Florida gives you more than one correct county.

§736.0201 provides that judicial proceedings concerning trusts are commenced by filing a complaint and are governed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and that “a trust is not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by the court.” A trust case is a civil case, not a supervised probate administration.

The same section lists what a court can be asked to do, and not all of it is adversarial. Alongside removal of a trustee, review of fees and settling accounts, §736.0201 covers proceedings for trust construction, for instructions, and for declaratory relief — the route for a beneficiary who needs a term interpreted rather than a trustee punished.

§736.0204 is the venue statute — not §736.0201 or §736.0202, which are frequently miscited for this. Venue “may be laid in” any of three places:

  • any county where venue is proper under chapter 47;
  • any county where the beneficiary suing or being sued resides or has its principal place of business; or
  • the county where the trust has its principal place of administration.

These are alternatives, not a hierarchy — which is why the county table below matters. The local filing and hearing practices of the circuit you choose can decide how fast the case moves.

Can you handle this if you live out of state or overseas?

Yes. A large share of Florida trust litigation is brought by beneficiaries who do not live here — adult children in New York, siblings in Bogotá or Caracas, a remainder beneficiary in Madrid, while the trust’s real property and the trustee sit in South Florida.

You do not need to be in Florida to be a party. §736.0204 lets venue be laid where the trust is administered, and an out-of-state beneficiary is represented here in the ordinary way. Documents are exchanged electronically, hearings are frequently remote, and the consultation happens by phone or video in English or Spanish.

What does require attention is where the trust’s principal place of administration actually is, and whether trust assets sit in more than one state. That question is worth asking on the first call, because it decides which court hears the case.

What does “trust litigation specialist” mean in Florida?

It is a regulated term. The Florida Bar certifies in Wills, Trusts and Estates, and Rule 4-7.14 permits specialist or expert only where the claim is objectively verifiable — by that certification, or by the lawyer’s training, record and substantial involvement in the area.

What is verifiable about this office:

  • Jose M. Lorenzo, Jr., Florida Bar No. 107002, licensed and in active practice in Florida since 2005. Anyone can confirm it free in The Florida Bar’s member directory.
  • Practice concentrated in probate, wills, trusts and the transfer of Florida real property.
  • Solo practice: the same person answers the phone, files the petition and appears in court. The trust litigator who takes your call is the one who tries the case.
  • Service in English and Spanish, in all 67 Florida counties.

What you will not read here is that this is the best trust litigation law firm in Florida. Rule 4-7.13 prohibits unsupported comparisons.

What to do this week

If an accounting has arrived, the six-month clock in §736.1008 is already running. If a trust instrument and a notice arrived together, the §736.0604 contest clock is running too. Those are the two most urgent items on this page.

Bring three things:

  1. The trust instrument and every amendment — especially anything signed in the settlor’s final two years.
  2. Every accounting or disclosure the trustee has sent, with the date each arrived and the envelope it came in.
  3. Anything showing what the trustee has actually done — bank statements, deeds, closing documents, the name of anyone who bought trust property.

Speak to a trust litigation attorney directly. Jose M. Lorenzo, Jr. — (305) 224-6811. Free consultation in English or Spanish, in all 67 Florida counties. You can also write from the contact page.

Related: Florida probate litigation lawyer · Florida guardianship litigation · Florida trustee removal attorney · Florida breach of fiduciary duty attorney · Florida will contest · contesting a will in Florida.

Contested trusts and estates by county

Trust litigation is filed in circuit court, and §736.0204 usually gives you a choice of county. Local filing and hearing rules differ in ways that decide how fast a case moves. Each page below carries the court address, the filing traps and the deadlines for that county.

County Circuit Page What that county turns on
Miami-Dade Eleventh Miami probate litigation attorney Ancillary administration, foreign families, §733.304 qualification
Broward Seventeenth Fort Lauderdale probate litigation attorney Fee objections, the elective share, Local Rule 10A
Palm Beach (north) Fifteenth West Palm Beach probate litigation attorney Five clerk locations, the P.O. Box 4667 will rule
Palm Beach (south) Fifteenth Boca Raton probate litigation attorney Domicile fights, part-year residents, ancillary probate
Hillsborough Thirteenth Tampa probate litigation attorney Acknowledgment of venue, no e-filing of original wills
Pinellas & Pasco Sixth Pinellas County probate litigation attorney Two counties, two clerks, §825.1035 injunctions
Orange & Osceola Ninth Orlando probate litigation attorney Trust administration for relocated retirees, out-of-state successor trustees
Duval Fourth Jacksonville probate litigation lawyer Corporate trustees, trustee malfeasance claims against institutions
Sarasota & Manatee Twelfth Sarasota probate attorney Seasonal residents, domicile, multi-state trust assets
Monroe (the Keys) Sixteenth Florida probate litigation Islamorada and Key West real property held in trust, remote hearings

South Florida. Trust disputes in Miami Beach are heard in the Eleventh Circuit in Miami-Dade, and Miami Beach produces a disproportionate share of them — condominium units held in trust, part-year residents, and settlors whose families are spread across several countries. The same is true of Coral Gables, Aventura, Hialeah, Coral Way, Brickell and Sunny Isles Beach. In Broward, contested trusts come most often from Fort Lauderdale, Plantation, Pembroke Pines and Weston.

Palm Beach County. A trust litigation attorney in Boca Raton is usually dealing with a domicile fight — a settlor who split the year between Florida and somewhere colder, and an out-of-state family arguing about which state’s law governs. North of the county line, West Palm Beach and Palm Beach Gardens cases turn more often on the Fifteenth Circuit’s five clerk locations and on trustee compensation objections.

Central Florida. Trust litigation around Orlando — including Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Kissimmee, Celebration and The Villages — has a distinct pattern: trusts drafted in another state, a settlor who retired to Florida, and a successor trustee who has never lived here. Those cases raise principal-place-of-administration questions before they raise anything else.

Contested trust matters are handled in all 67 Florida counties, in English and in Spanish.

About this page. Author and reviewer: Jose M. Lorenzo, Jr., Florida Bar No. 107002, in practice in the state since 2005. Every statute cited was read against the Florida Trust Code on August 23, 2026.

This page offers general information about Florida law and does not constitute legal advice for a specific case. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every trust turns on its own facts, and the law changes.

Talk to a Florida probate attorney today

Every probate matter is different. A short call can tell you where you stand and what your deadlines are — at no cost.

Call (305) 224-6811or send us a message

florida probate process

florida probate process

Our Promise To You

At Lorenzo Law, we approach every case with honor, integrity, and genuine care. We provide premier legal service while guiding you through the process clearly and simply, so you can focus on what matters most.

Talk With Us: (305) 224-6811

Article Categories

  • Blog
  • Deeds & Property
  • Disputes
  • Estate Planning
  • Guardianship
  • Probate
  • Trusts

Recent Posts

  • Adding or Removing a Name on a Florida Deed
  • Do You Inherit Debt in Florida?
  • Inherited a Collection in Florida Probate? Cards, Coins and Watches — and Why Nobody Knows What They’re Worth
  • The Florida Probate Questions People Are Too Embarrassed to Ask a Lawyer
  • Does a Power of Attorney End at Death in Florida? What Still Works, and What Can Make You Pay It Back
Link to: Contact Us

Questions? Feel free to contact us.

Lorenzo Law Firm is ready to answer your questions or concerns. Feel free to contact us at your earliest convenience and make sure to call us in an emergency.

Lorenzo Law

Miami-Dade Office: 2850 Douglas Rd. Suite 303, Coral Gables, FL 33134

Broward: 12 SE 7th Street, Suite 701. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Phone: (305) 224-6811 | Email: jml@lorenzolaw.com

We provide legal services throughout Florida including those in the following localities: Miami-Dade County including Aventura, Bal Harbour, Brickell, Coconut Grove, Coral Gables, Coral Way, Cutler Bay, Doral, Downtown Miami, Florida City, Fontainebleau, Hialeah, Homestead, Kendall, Key Biscayne, Liberty City, Miami, Miami Beach, Miami Gardens, Miami Lakes, Miami Shores, Miami Springs, North Miami, North Miami Beach, Opa-locka, Overtown, Palmetto Bay, Pinecrest, South Miami, Sunny Isles Beach, Surfside, Tamiami, The Hammocks, West Miami, and Westchester; Broward County including Fort Lauderdale, Coconut Creek, Cooper City, Coral Springs, Dania Beach, Davie, Hallandale Beach, Hollywood, Lauderhill, Lighthouse Point, Margate, North Lauderdale, Oakland Park, Pembroke Park, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Pompano Beach, Southwest Ranches, Sunrise, Tamarac, Weston, and Wilton Manors; Palm Beach County including West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, and Delray Beach; Orange County including Orlando, Apopka, Bay Lake, Belle Isle, Edgewood, Lake Buena Vista, Maitland, Ocoee, Winter Garden, Winter Park, Eatonville, Oakland, and Windermere; Osceola County including Kissimmee and Celebration; Duval County including Jacksonville, Jacksonville Beach, Atlantic Beach, and Neptune Beach; Hillsborough County including Tampa; Pinellas County including St. Petersburg and Gulfport; Okaloosa County including Fort Walton Beach; and Sumter, Lake, and Marion Counties including The Villages.

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Lorenzo Law and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

About Us | Contact Us | The Firm | Resources

Scroll to top